Saturday, May 22, 2010

Embracing English

In earlier times upon the earth, people lived scattered in essentially isolated tribes, each with it's own separate language or dialect, each entirely incomprehensible to any other. Mostly, these tribes lived in fear and ignorance of one another, territorial divisions sustained by constant conflict, collective prejudices nurtured by the community and passed down from one generation to the next.

In those days, there was no real communication between tribes. There were no common languages, little to communicate if there were, and geography generally discouraged even the opportunity.

Then, the wheel was invented, and we were off and running. People started traveling, and started mingling.

Nowadays, tribal divisions have all but disappeared. The idea and identity of historical collectives lingers on, yet more as the memories and remnants of an earlier time.

The new reality is that we are now one people upon the earth. Around the world, individuals exchange ideas in an instant. The internet has allowed an unprecedented opportunity to communicate, educate, exchange, and inspire. Even the recent development of big screen, high definition TVs allows a more intimate and moving view of the world around us.

In this unfolding global village, it is inevitable that a single global language is emerging. Contrary to the convictions of many, this is not leading to a single, homogeneous global culture. Just the opposite. The values and virtues of all cultures are being brought into the world. Our lives are being enriched by the wisdom and experience of all.

Equally, the vices and oppressions of some societies are becoming clear and obvious to all, including the citizens of these cultures. Repressive regimes maintain their tyranny by restricting and denying communication and information. Linguistic barriers achieve the same effect. An inability to communicate clearly and directly achieves the same mutual isolation and intellectual impoverishment. Oppressed people do not really understand their own situation without context to other societies.

Inevitably, there will be those who feel offended or threatened as the world embraces a common language. A tribalist perspective remains deep in our understanding of "who we are". The idea of "my people"- viewing the world in terms of racial divisions- has been ingrained for so many millenniums that it requires constant reassessment and reminder of the new reality that we are truly one people now.

The true foundation of "who we are" is that we are each a unique individual. I am not my race, my language, my region, or my country. Equally, I recognise and consider others as individuals. I would not hesitate a moment, were a language other than my own emerging as the common language of the world, to apply myself to learn this new language. It would not be a threat to my own identity or values. It would have the opposite effect. It would allow me to communicate with everyone.

At some point, we must find the courage of consensus to understand that the emerging global language has become English. This is not a victory for English (or "the English), as if triumphant from some great battle, all other languages having been mercilessly ground into submission. It is just the new reality.

It has become the responsibility of every conscientious parent to make sure that their children are comfortably fluent in English. This ensures that they are comfortable throughout their country and in the world, able to communicate clearly and easily with all. This ensures that they can be enriched by the abundance and opportunity of the internet, and share their lives with all.

I offer that it is Canada's time to lead the world in embracing English as our single official language, as an inspiration and example of a people big enough to change when the time has come, and when change is right.

11 comments:

  1. I agree wholeheartedly with your comments and enjoy your various postings.
    Please note that "its" is the possessive form, not "it's", which always means either "it is" or "it has". (See your first sentence.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. ... Cornell: Appreciate your patience. I believe that I have grasped both of today's lessons.
    ... I do not think that 15 years of public school taught me anything of value. I should just have taken a decent course in grammar instead. I could have taken it from there.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's interesting that you write about the importance of language as a communication tool but language is also a means of understanding the world around us. the concepts we use integrate an idea, sometime very complex ideas, into one understandable unit.
    The dilemma we face is the disrespect so many people have using terms precisely - that destroys our understanding and our ability to communicate. We may just as well go back to speaking different languages, for that is the effect sloppy language use is having.

    ReplyDelete
  4. ... Garret: I wonder if sloppy language is a product of having really very little of any value to express?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Iain, I believe it is a reflection of sloppy thinking. Of course, the redeeming value of the expression is also the result of the sloppy intellectual process. Muddled attempts at communication are usually a sign of dishonesty or a disintegrated thinking process. The ability to integrate new knowledge into one's existing knowledge base make possible the 'truth' checking that leads to sensible thought and sensible communication.
    Anyway, that's how I see it.

    ReplyDelete
  6. ... Garret: Along the same lines: It is unlikely that modern youth have little more to communicate than grunts of pleasure or displeasure.

    ReplyDelete
  7. If the Youth learn from our present capitulators, grunting would be an improvement. Go ruin the Country some more with your bilingual appeasement crap.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Dear Sir -

    If humanity has nothing to learn from its past, if we are so mercifully rid of the times people knew how to do things for themselves, like cook, hunt, build and survive with very little, than I guess the richness of the world's languages, which includes a wide variety of cultures and perspectives, should be destroyed as well.

    You clearly are a superior being as an anglophone, and it is time everyone adapt to you. I think you should do a european tour of dinner tables, where people are speaking french, italian, spanish, german, and 28 other languages, and browbeat them as to why they aren't speaking english yet.

    ReplyDelete
  9. ... Thorny: Appreciate your thoughts.
    ... Though, I cannot understand why you would consider a single common tongue an impediment to any exchange of values, insights, and wisdom from throughout the world.
    ... Also, I am not an "anglophone". I am an individual upon the earth who speaks English, which has indisputably become the emerging international language. There is nothing superior or inferior about English over other languages- certainly nothing superior or inferior about those who speak English.
    ... A single common global language is inevitable and to the advantage of all.

    ReplyDelete
  10. ......... A single common global language is not inevitable. Language forms the bedrock of cultural identities, which appear not to be homogenizing in the way you imagine.
    ......... Hang out with people who speak English as a second language, once you learn their first, and you will see just how insular linguistic groups really are, and how durable the cultures that result.
    ......... Besides, if you really think the Muslim world and China (to name only two) are going to give up their language anytime soon, you're crazy. Check out Japanese proficiency in English, still very poor after many years and much investment.
    ......... Pipe dream!

    ReplyDelete
  11. ... Oolor: Good thoughts.
    ... I am no great fan of the assumption that a common language would threaten cultures or create a single, homogeneous culture.
    ... If I were a younger man, and the world had come to endorse a single language other than my own, I would do my best to learn the language, be absolutely certain that my children were fluent, yet it would not change my values in any way.
    ... I think that those who cling to linguistic barriers to protect their culture are really just unsure about the virtues of their culture.

    ReplyDelete